<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freak In</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patriotsdaily.com/2008/03/freak-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patriotsdaily.com/2008/03/freak-in/</link>
	<description>Where Every Day Is Patriots Day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:41:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamesgarnerisgod</title>
		<link>http://www.patriotsdaily.com/2008/03/freak-in/comment-page-1/#comment-2877</link>
		<dc:creator>jamesgarnerisgod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 04:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriotsdaily.com/2008/03/freak-in/#comment-2877</guid>
		<description>You criticized the Patriots, and now you must pay.

OK, I admit I might have jumped a little unnecessarily ugly on my post and, FWIW, I wasn&#039;t accusing you of making excuses, though I can certainly see how my post could be read that way. 

My point is simply that emphasizing the O isn&#039;t what did the Pates in -- besides, they REALLY needed to emphasize the offense, despite their past Super Bowl success (which was two years removed as of this year&#039;s game and now, I guess, three years removed). The defensive shortcomings, though, are independent of the offensive re-tooling. The D had to do largely with an aging (though still elite) corps handling more of the workload than anticipated, once Colvin and some of the younger guys, like Oscar Lua, either got injured or just didn&#039;t pan out for one reason or another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You criticized the Patriots, and now you must pay.</p>
<p>OK, I admit I might have jumped a little unnecessarily ugly on my post and, FWIW, I wasn&#8217;t accusing you of making excuses, though I can certainly see how my post could be read that way. </p>
<p>My point is simply that emphasizing the O isn&#8217;t what did the Pates in &#8212; besides, they REALLY needed to emphasize the offense, despite their past Super Bowl success (which was two years removed as of this year&#8217;s game and now, I guess, three years removed). The defensive shortcomings, though, are independent of the offensive re-tooling. The D had to do largely with an aging (though still elite) corps handling more of the workload than anticipated, once Colvin and some of the younger guys, like Oscar Lua, either got injured or just didn&#8217;t pan out for one reason or another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Len</title>
		<link>http://www.patriotsdaily.com/2008/03/freak-in/comment-page-1/#comment-2876</link>
		<dc:creator>Len</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 03:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriotsdaily.com/2008/03/freak-in/#comment-2876</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with you on the defense thing (although they&#039;re not entirely to blame for the Super Bowl loss - the offense only scored 14 points). I&#039;m interested in seeing how Dom Capers helps with our secondary, as I strongly feel that the unit as a whole was very inconsistent last season. I grew increasingly annoyed at the amount of times our defense gave up third and long, and I know I&#039;m not the only one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with you on the defense thing (although they&#8217;re not entirely to blame for the Super Bowl loss &#8211; the offense only scored 14 points). I&#8217;m interested in seeing how Dom Capers helps with our secondary, as I strongly feel that the unit as a whole was very inconsistent last season. I grew increasingly annoyed at the amount of times our defense gave up third and long, and I know I&#8217;m not the only one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy B</title>
		<link>http://www.patriotsdaily.com/2008/03/freak-in/comment-page-1/#comment-2874</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 23:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriotsdaily.com/2008/03/freak-in/#comment-2874</guid>
		<description>To tell you the truth I think we are TOO focused on the offence...I think the Pats need to change their DEFENSIVE PHILOSOPHY...This bend but don&#039;t break stuff is starting to wear on me. There were too many times this year where the Pats couldn&#039;t get off the field on 3rd down....even though they held the Giants to 17 points, that opening drive where the Giants held the ball for 10 MINUTES was huge for them confidence wise. 

        There were also too many times where I found myself yelling,  &quot;WHERE&#039;S THE PASS RUSH?!!...say what you want about the offence but if the defense did it&#039;s job the last 2 years it could have been 5 in 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To tell you the truth I think we are TOO focused on the offence&#8230;I think the Pats need to change their DEFENSIVE PHILOSOPHY&#8230;This bend but don&#8217;t break stuff is starting to wear on me. There were too many times this year where the Pats couldn&#8217;t get off the field on 3rd down&#8230;.even though they held the Giants to 17 points, that opening drive where the Giants held the ball for 10 MINUTES was huge for them confidence wise. </p>
<p>        There were also too many times where I found myself yelling,  &#8220;WHERE&#8217;S THE PASS RUSH?!!&#8230;say what you want about the offence but if the defense did it&#8217;s job the last 2 years it could have been 5 in 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.patriotsdaily.com/2008/03/freak-in/comment-page-1/#comment-2870</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriotsdaily.com/2008/03/freak-in/#comment-2870</guid>
		<description>philosophical decisions aren&#039;t made by Moss, I meant to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>philosophical decisions aren&#8217;t made by Moss, I meant to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.patriotsdaily.com/2008/03/freak-in/comment-page-1/#comment-2869</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriotsdaily.com/2008/03/freak-in/#comment-2869</guid>
		<description>If that&#039;s what you took away from what was written in this entry and those over last weekend then sorry for my part in the confusion. I don&#039;t know what to tell you other than that. 

As far as excuse-making - you&#039;ve got the wrong guy. You can&#039;t tell past Super Bowl whiners to STFU and then start bleeding excuses the first time (literally) the things didn&#039;t go the Pats way. If you can find anywhere on past posts where I made an excuse for that loss, I owe you $5.

Niether is anybody blaming Moss for anything. I&#039;ve said from the beginning of this discussion that he is a unique talent, and that if they lost him, it would leave a big hole in their offense as we know it today. You&#039;d have to first be concerned about the impact on Welker, for example.

The point all along has been about offensive philosophy, and that such a unique resource like Moss almost compels you to lean heavily towards the pass as an orientation. That leads to things like lining up with four wide receivers on 3rd and short or 1st and goal inside the 5, which is kind of a tone setting thing in my opinion, for better or worse. I draw a line from that to things like being unable to cope with the physical pounding they took along the front line in early February, or in the Ravens game, or the Eagles game. That&#039;s the point. If you want to read that as me blaming Randy Moss, go ahead, but I&#039;d say philosophical decisions are made by Moss, they&#039;re made by the coaching staff and the personnel department. If I&#039;m blaming anyone, its them. Except I&#039;m not blaming them either. Just maybe disagreeing with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that&#8217;s what you took away from what was written in this entry and those over last weekend then sorry for my part in the confusion. I don&#8217;t know what to tell you other than that. </p>
<p>As far as excuse-making &#8211; you&#8217;ve got the wrong guy. You can&#8217;t tell past Super Bowl whiners to STFU and then start bleeding excuses the first time (literally) the things didn&#8217;t go the Pats way. If you can find anywhere on past posts where I made an excuse for that loss, I owe you $5.</p>
<p>Niether is anybody blaming Moss for anything. I&#8217;ve said from the beginning of this discussion that he is a unique talent, and that if they lost him, it would leave a big hole in their offense as we know it today. You&#8217;d have to first be concerned about the impact on Welker, for example.</p>
<p>The point all along has been about offensive philosophy, and that such a unique resource like Moss almost compels you to lean heavily towards the pass as an orientation. That leads to things like lining up with four wide receivers on 3rd and short or 1st and goal inside the 5, which is kind of a tone setting thing in my opinion, for better or worse. I draw a line from that to things like being unable to cope with the physical pounding they took along the front line in early February, or in the Ravens game, or the Eagles game. That&#8217;s the point. If you want to read that as me blaming Randy Moss, go ahead, but I&#8217;d say philosophical decisions are made by Moss, they&#8217;re made by the coaching staff and the personnel department. If I&#8217;m blaming anyone, its them. Except I&#8217;m not blaming them either. Just maybe disagreeing with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamesgarnerisgod</title>
		<link>http://www.patriotsdaily.com/2008/03/freak-in/comment-page-1/#comment-2868</link>
		<dc:creator>jamesgarnerisgod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriotsdaily.com/2008/03/freak-in/#comment-2868</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right, the Pates lost the Super Bowl because of Randy Moss. It couldn&#039;t be that they were outplayed and outcoached by an NFC team that actually deserved to be in the Super Bowl, rather than being a team that was the least weak of a weak-sister league.

To review, the &quot;all-pro&quot; front line was tormented all night by a fast and physical Football Giants D-line. Brady was pummeled like Floyd Mayweather&#039;s speed bag. And the Pates D was just worn down by a never-say-die New York offense. 

As much as it pains me to write this, the Patriots were beaten in the Super Bowl. No excuses.

Oh wait, here&#039;s one: It&#039;s all Randy Moss&#039; fault.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right, the Pates lost the Super Bowl because of Randy Moss. It couldn&#8217;t be that they were outplayed and outcoached by an NFC team that actually deserved to be in the Super Bowl, rather than being a team that was the least weak of a weak-sister league.</p>
<p>To review, the &#8220;all-pro&#8221; front line was tormented all night by a fast and physical Football Giants D-line. Brady was pummeled like Floyd Mayweather&#8217;s speed bag. And the Pates D was just worn down by a never-say-die New York offense. </p>
<p>As much as it pains me to write this, the Patriots were beaten in the Super Bowl. No excuses.</p>
<p>Oh wait, here&#8217;s one: It&#8217;s all Randy Moss&#8217; fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://www.patriotsdaily.com/2008/03/freak-in/comment-page-1/#comment-2867</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 16:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriotsdaily.com/2008/03/freak-in/#comment-2867</guid>
		<description>How is Bernard Berrian getting more money guaranteed than Randy Moss?  It doesn&#039;t even appear that anyone was really even bidding for him as Clayton reported Philly just offered him an extra year which is worthless in the NFL system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is Bernard Berrian getting more money guaranteed than Randy Moss?  It doesn&#8217;t even appear that anyone was really even bidding for him as Clayton reported Philly just offered him an extra year which is worthless in the NFL system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Box_O_Rocks</title>
		<link>http://www.patriotsdaily.com/2008/03/freak-in/comment-page-1/#comment-2866</link>
		<dc:creator>Box_O_Rocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriotsdaily.com/2008/03/freak-in/#comment-2866</guid>
		<description>Scott, which leg you want broken? Seriously, I&#039;m with you, I was pounding the arm of my chair on the last scoring drive of the SB with Giants DL dropping like flies muttering &quot;too fast, too fast, you&#039;ve got to eat up the clock more!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, which leg you want broken? Seriously, I&#8217;m with you, I was pounding the arm of my chair on the last scoring drive of the SB with Giants DL dropping like flies muttering &#8220;too fast, too fast, you&#8217;ve got to eat up the clock more!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.patriotsdaily.com/2008/03/freak-in/comment-page-1/#comment-2865</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriotsdaily.com/2008/03/freak-in/#comment-2865</guid>
		<description>the concern is an over-emphasis on the passing game, not that they throw to Moss and no one else. The concern is that by over-emphasizing the pass, it comes at the expense of other elements of a balanced team&#039;s offense, which doesn&#039;t seem like such an outlandish statement given the events of the Super Bowl, particularly along the line of scrimmage. What&#039;s laughable is that the best you can muster in response is 98-1493-23. Way to get beneath the surface. You want to start talking about all the teams that rolled up eye popping numbers but yet never were able to close the deal?  How is it that Pats fans have spent all this time making fun of Dan Marino&#039;s one Super Bowl appearance but yet find it &#039;laughable&#039; that an over-emphasis on the pass might not be a good thing? Give me a break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the concern is an over-emphasis on the passing game, not that they throw to Moss and no one else. The concern is that by over-emphasizing the pass, it comes at the expense of other elements of a balanced team&#8217;s offense, which doesn&#8217;t seem like such an outlandish statement given the events of the Super Bowl, particularly along the line of scrimmage. What&#8217;s laughable is that the best you can muster in response is 98-1493-23. Way to get beneath the surface. You want to start talking about all the teams that rolled up eye popping numbers but yet never were able to close the deal?  How is it that Pats fans have spent all this time making fun of Dan Marino&#8217;s one Super Bowl appearance but yet find it &#8216;laughable&#8217; that an over-emphasis on the pass might not be a good thing? Give me a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy B</title>
		<link>http://www.patriotsdaily.com/2008/03/freak-in/comment-page-1/#comment-2863</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 01:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patriotsdaily.com/2008/03/freak-in/#comment-2863</guid>
		<description>I find it laugable that some people are even considering the fact that signing a guy who caught 98 balls 23 touchdowns and had 1,493 yards is somehow a BAD THING.....OH THAT&#039;S RIGHT!...The Patriots have been to 4 Super Bowls this decade but lost the one with Moss on the team!...and Brady is too focused on Moss, I guess those 112 balls Welker caught were a figment of my imagination....jeeze</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it laugable that some people are even considering the fact that signing a guy who caught 98 balls 23 touchdowns and had 1,493 yards is somehow a BAD THING&#8230;..OH THAT&#8217;S RIGHT!&#8230;The Patriots have been to 4 Super Bowls this decade but lost the one with Moss on the team!&#8230;and Brady is too focused on Moss, I guess those 112 balls Welker caught were a figment of my imagination&#8230;.jeeze</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

